Barriers to the Application of Artificial Intelligence for Performance Evaluation in SAMPAD Schools

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence , performance assessment , SAMPAD schools , implementation barriers , gifted education

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and conceptualize the barriers to applying artificial intelligence (AI) for performance evaluation in SAMPAD schools and to explain the human, organizational, technical, and ethical dimensions influencing the adoption and implementation of this technology. This qualitative study employed reflexive thematic analysis. Participants comprised 17 academic and executive experts with substantial experience in gifted education and the educational application of emerging technologies, recruited from Tehran, East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan, and Kurdistan provinces through maximum-variation purposive and snowball sampling. Sampling continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Data were collected through 45–75-minute semi-structured interviews and analyzed according to Braun and Clarke’s six-phase reflexive thematic analysis framework. Trustworthiness was enhanced through prolonged engagement with the data, participant triangulation, member checking, comprehensive documentation of the analytical process, reflexive memo writing, and independent coding. Analysis generated 214 initial codes, which were refined into 87 preliminary concepts and subsequently organized into four major themes and 16 subthemes. The four principal themes were attitudinal and cultural barriers, structural and organizational barriers, technical and infrastructural barriers, and ethical and legal barriers. Resistance to technology, concerns about displacement of the human role, distrust of AI-generated outputs, and traditional approaches to assessment interacted with bureaucracy, centralized decision-making, organizational inflexibility, and excessive workloads. Inadequate technological infrastructure, implementation and maintenance costs, bandwidth limitations, and insufficient technical support further constrained implementation. Ethical and legal concerns involved student privacy, data protection, algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, regulatory gaps, and unclear accountability. Divergent findings additionally highlighted reduced human interaction, digital inequality in disadvantaged regions, and limitations of Persian-language AI content. AI-based performance evaluation in SAMPAD schools is constrained by interconnected human, institutional, technical, and normative barriers. Effective implementation therefore requires an integrated strategy encompassing teacher capacity building and trust development, organizational reform, equitable infrastructure investment and sustained technical support, and transparent ethical and legal frameworks for data protection, bias mitigation, explainability, and accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, S., & Tahmasbzadeh Sheikhlar, D. (2024). Feasibility of applying artificial intelligence in Iranian primary education. Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction.

Ahmadi, S. M. (2025). Ethical challenges of using artificial intelligence in children's education Seventh National Conference on Professional Research in Psychology and Counseling from the Teacher's Perspective, Minab.

Al-Bawaleez, M., & Turkey, J. A. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in gifted education institutes in Jordan: Effects, roles, practices, and transformations. Educational process: international journal, 16, e2025234. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.234

Alam, T. H. I., & Windiarti, I. S. (2025). The future of artificial intelligence in interactive learning: Trends, challenges, opportunities. Engineering Proceedings, 84(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084087

Berkovich, I. (2025). The rise of AI-assisted instructional leadership: Empirical survey of generative AI integration in school leadership and management work. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1643023. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1643023

Elias, M. J., Marsili, F., Fullmer, L., Morganti, A., & Bruno, E. (2025). The social-emotional competencies of gifted children must be intentionally developed. Gifted Education International, 41(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241300393

Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: Trends, benefits, and challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084

Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(11), 2518-2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886

Guilbault, K. M., Wang, Y., & McCormick, K. M. (2025). Using ChatGPT in the secondary gifted classroom for personalized learning and mentoring. Gifted Child Today, 48(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241308950

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036

Hasani Abiz, Z., Nasari Abahamzeh, M., Rahmani, M., & Yazdani, L. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in transforming education: Opportunities and challenges for teachers First National Conference on Teaching Skills, Masjed Soleyman.

Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2022). Quo vadis artificial intelligence? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8

Kakaian, Z. (2025). Analyzing opportunities and challenges of using artificial intelligence in Iran's education system Fifth International Conference on Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering, and Technology, Hamadan.

Karakose, T., & Tülübaş, T. (2024). School leadership and management in the age of artificial intelligence (AI): Recent developments and future prospects. Educational process: international journal, 13(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.131.1

Keramati, S. M., & Afrasiabi, M. (2022). Examining the duties of educational managers. Management and Accounting Studies, 8(1).

Mohseni, A., & Abedi, A. (2025). Multifaceted giftedness: A cultural exploration of giftedness among Iranian primary school teachers. Gifted Education International, 41(3), 410-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294251364087

Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers' trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232

Phillipson, S. N., Han, C. D., & Lee, V. C. S. (2023). Artificial neural networks and the Actiotope Model of giftedness-Clever solutions from complex environments. Journal of Intelligence, 11(7), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11070128

Salehnejad Beh Rastaqi, S., Shoghi, B., & Heydari Parchakouhi, A. (2024). Developing a model for applying artificial intelligence in the national education system: Antecedents and consequences. New Findings in Psychology, 24(20), 130-146.

Siegle, D. (2023). A role for ChatGPT and AI in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049

Tasdan, M., Kartal, M., Gözüm, A. İ. C., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). Digital transformation in school management: Insights from administrators' perspectives. In Digital Transformation in Education (pp. 1-20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9806-7.ch012

Zhang, W., Shankar, A., & Antonidoss, A. (2022). Modern art education and teaching based on artificial intelligence. Journal of Interconnection Networks, 22(Supp01), 2141005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021926592141005X

Zhu, H., Sun, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1111. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05252-6

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Jamali, J. ., & Talebi, B. (1404). Barriers to the Application of Artificial Intelligence for Performance Evaluation in SAMPAD Schools. Learning, Training, and Education in Schools in the Third Millennium, 2(4), 1-21. https://jltestm.com/index.php/jltestm/article/view/82