Investigation and Comparison of Creative Models for Online Teaching of Vocabulary and Grammar in Senior Secondary English Textbooks Using a Corpus-Based Approach
Keywords:
Creative Teaching Models, Online English Language Teaching, Vocabulary Teaching, Grammar Teaching, Corpus-Based Approach, Upper Secondary EducationAbstract
This study aimed to identify, examine, and compare the dimensions and components of creative models for online teaching of vocabulary and grammar in senior secondary English textbooks using a corpus-based approach. This study employed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design consisting of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews covering eight areas of expertise were used to develop 72 initial codes, which were organized into nine components and three overarching dimensions: educational, technological, and support and services. The target population of the quantitative phase comprised English teachers in public education, instructors at foreign-language institutes, and e-learning specialists in Isfahan. For an assumed population of 300 individuals, a sample size of 169 was determined using Cochran’s formula. Data were collected using a researcher-developed 72-item questionnaire rated on a five-point Likert scale. Reliability analysis, factor analysis, the Friedman test, and Spearman’s rank-order correlation were applied for data analysis. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (χ²=6538.896, df=2556, p<0.001), and the KMO index was 0.818, indicating adequate factorability. Parallel analysis supported retention of seven factors, whereas the nine-factor solution showed greater correspondence with the theoretical classification of the instrument. The Friedman test revealed a significant difference among the ranks of the nine components (χ²=74.837, df=8, p<0.001), although the effect size was small (Kendall’s W=0.055). Learning activities and teaching methods received the highest rankings. A weak but significant positive correlation was found between the educational and technological dimensions (ρ=0.175, p=0.023). However, neither the relationship between education and support (ρ=0.065, p=0.399) nor that between technology and support (ρ=0.037, p=0.634) was statistically significant. Corpus-based creative online teaching models should primarily emphasize active learning activities and exploratory teaching methods while promoting effective integration of educational and technological elements; however, the factorial distinctiveness of the technological and support components requires further validation in independent samples.
Downloads
References
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
Boulton, A., & Vyatkina, N. (2021). Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 66-89. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73450
Crosthwaite, P., Luciana, & Wijaya, D. (2023). Exploring language teachers' lesson planning for corpus-based language teaching: A focus on developing TPACK for corpora and DDL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1392-1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1995001
Crosthwaite, P., & Steeples, B. (2024). Data-driven learning with younger learners: Exploring corpus-assisted development of the passive voice for science writing with female secondary school students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6), 1166-1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2068615
Emir, G., & Saral, N. Ç. (2025). Exploring emerging issues in corpus applications in ELT: A systematic review. Participatory educational research, 12(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.16.12.2
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In A. O'Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 359-370). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-26
Liu, J., & Ma, Q. (2025). Examining corpus-based language pedagogy (CBLP) practices in data-driven learning (DDL) for low-proficiency L2 English learners: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 53-76.
Looi, J., Boulton, A., Hassan, R., & Riget, P. N. (2025). Data-driven learning: A linguistically authentic complement to coursebooks for foreign language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 2148-2171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12753
Lu, C. (2025). AI-generated corpus learning and EFL learners' learning of grammatical structures, lexical bundles, and willingness to write. PLoS One, 20(7), e0321544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321544
Lusta, A., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2023). Language corpus and data driven learning (DDL) in language classrooms: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(12), e22731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22731
Ma, Q., Chiu, M. M., Lin, S., & Mendoza, N. B. (2023). Teachers' perceived corpus literacy and their intention to integrate corpora into classroom teaching: A survey study. Recall, 35(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000180
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Sun, W., & Park, E. (2023). EFL learners' collocation acquisition and learning in corpus-based instruction: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(17), 13242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713242
Vyatkina, N. (2016). Data-driven learning for beginners: The case of German verb-preposition collocations. Recall, 28(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000269
Yoon, K. H., & Lee, D. J. (2024). A meta-analysis of data-driven learning (DDL) in EFL/ESL settings. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 14(2), 283-304. https://doi.org/10.31216/BDL.20240017
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1404 Saeideh Shafiei (Author); Mansoureh Sajjadi (Corresponding author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.