Elucidating the Role of Blended Learning in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Teaching–Learning Processes

Authors

    Elham Nikrosh Department of Educational Planning, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
    Narges Sharifi * Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran sharifi.narges92@gmail.com
    Hamidreza Shams Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Keywords:

Blended learning, teaching–learning, academic motivation, teacher empowerment, educational equity

Abstract

This study aimed to examine and clarify the role of blended learning in improving the effectiveness of teaching–learning processes in contemporary educational settings. The research employed a qualitative analytical review design. Data were collected through a systematic review of 15 peer-reviewed articles related to blended learning and learning effectiveness. Data analysis was conducted using NVivo version 14 with a qualitative content analysis approach, including open, axial, and selective coding. The analytical process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, allowing extraction and organization of concepts, subcategories, and main categories. The results indicated that blended learning, by creating an integrated learning framework, combining diverse instructional methods, enhancing active learner roles, and redesigning learning environments, improves learning quality, deepens conceptual understanding, develops critical thinking skills, and strengthens motivation and engagement. Additionally, this approach empowers teachers professionally, enhances teacher–student interactions, and increases teacher job satisfaction. At the institutional level, blended learning promotes educational equity, system flexibility, and resource efficiency, providing the necessary context for preparedness and responsiveness to environmental changes. By leveraging the advantages of both face-to-face and online learning, blended learning not only enhances the effectiveness of teaching–learning processes but also produces positive organizational and institutional outcomes. The findings of this study can guide educators, planners, and policymakers in designing flexible, dynamic, and effective learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–454.

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), 1–16.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

OECD. (2019). Innovating education and educating for innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748–762.

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wang, F. H., Han, J. H., & Yang, H. Z. (2015). Exploring the effect of blended learning. Computers & Education, 87, 83–95.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

Submitted

2025-05-29

Revised

2025-07-03

Accepted

2025-07-09

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Nikrosh, E., Sharifi, N., & Shams, H. (2025). Elucidating the Role of Blended Learning in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Teaching–Learning Processes. Learning, Training, and Education in Schools in the Third Millennium, 2(3), 1-10. https://jltestm.com/index.php/jltestm/article/view/34

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.